Search for: "Jesse Willms"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 11:57 am
TweetThe life-is-good smile of Jesse Willms (Photo: jessewillms.com)The FTC has filed a lawsuit [pdf] targeting a Canadian online marketer, 24-year-old Jesse Willms, who has apparently made a fortune selling that acai berry weight-loss stuff. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:46 pm
One of Willms' companies, Just Think Media, lured consumers with free trial offers of tooth whiteners and acai berry diet pills and then charged them roughly $80 for monthly shipments they never agreed to, the suit said. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:08 am
Most of the defendants are based in Alberta.According to the FTC’s complaint, Edmonton-based Jesse Willms and 10 companies he controls used deceptive tactics in offering “free trials” for various products online, including acai berry weight-loss pills, teeth whiteners, and health supplements.The FTC says it worked closely with Canadian law enforcement, and thanked several Canadian organizations for their help, including the Competition Bureau, Service Alberta, and… [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:57 am
According to the complaint, defendant Jesse Willms and the ten companies he controls allegedly lured consumers into providing their debit and credit card numbers by offering deceptive “free” and “risk-free” trial offers for a variety of products including acai berry weight-loss pills, teeth whiteners, and health supplements. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
A settlement order, reached as part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to stamp out online marketing fraud, permanently bans Jesse Willms and his companies from using ‘negative-option’ marketing, a practice in which the seller interprets consumers’ silence or inaction as permission to charge them. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
A settlement order, reached as part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to stamp out online marketing fraud, permanently bans Jesse Willms and his companies from using ‘negative-option’ marketing, a practice in which the seller interprets consumers’ silence or inaction as permission to charge them. [read post]
